From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sacco v. Phillippsen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
272 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Summary

denying plaintiff passenger summary judgment on the issue of liability against defendant driver who struck a utility pole because whether the defendant's conduct was reasonable or whether the circumstances constituted an emergency were issues for the trier of fact

Summary of this case from Mangual v. Pleas

Opinion

May 10, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — Summary Judgment.

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., GREEN, WISNER AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries she sustained when the automobile in which she was a passenger slid off the road and struck a utility pole. Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on liability against defendants Elizabeth J. Phillippsen (defendant), the driver of the automobile, and Patricia J. Phillippsen, its owner. Plaintiff failed to establish her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law with respect to the applicability of the emergency doctrine. A reasonable view of the evidence supports the conclusion that defendant "was confronted by a sudden and unforeseen occurrence not of [her] own making" when the car ahead of her began swerving and she encountered a patch of snow on an otherwise clear road ( Rivera v. New York City Tr. Auth., 77 N.Y.2d 322, 327, rearg denied 77 N.Y.2d 990). Whether the circumstances constituted an emergency and whether defendant's conduct was reasonable in light of those circumstances are issues for the trier of fact ( see, Kuci v. Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 88 N.Y.2d 923, 924; Barber v. Young, 238 A.D.2d 822, 823-824, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 808; Davey v. Ohler, 188 A.D.2d 726, 727).


Summaries of

Sacco v. Phillippsen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
272 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

denying plaintiff passenger summary judgment on the issue of liability against defendant driver who struck a utility pole because whether the defendant's conduct was reasonable or whether the circumstances constituted an emergency were issues for the trier of fact

Summary of this case from Mangual v. Pleas
Case details for

Sacco v. Phillippsen

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH SACCO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ELIZABETH J. PHILLIPPSEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 10, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 571

Citing Cases

Stathis v. Mercy Medical Center

The Supreme Court erred in concluding, as a matter of law, that the emergency doctrine was applicable. There…

Mangual v. Pleas

A plaintiff passenger in a vehicle accident is not entitled to summary judgment as a matter of right against…