From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sabol v. Iannello

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2016
145 A.D.3d 1615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-23-2016

In the Matter of Andrew R. SABOL and Vicki J. Sabol, Petitioners–Respondents, v. Paula G. IANNELLO, Respondent–Appellant.

Peter J. DiGiorgio, Jr., Utica, for respondent-appellant. William H. Getman, Waterville, for petitioners-respondents. Joseph M. Cirillo, Attorney for the Children, Mohawk.


Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Herkimer County (Anthony J. Garramone, J.H.O.), entered September 22, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, granted petitioners visitation with the subject children.

Peter J. DiGiorgio, Jr., Utica, for respondent-appellant.

William H. Getman, Waterville, for petitioners-respondents.

Joseph M. Cirillo, Attorney for the Children, Mohawk.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sabol v. Iannello

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2016
145 A.D.3d 1615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Sabol v. Iannello

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Andrew R. SABOL and Vicki J. Sabol…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 23, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 1615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
145 A.D.3d 1615
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8760