Opinion
22-CV-2441 (LTS)
03-28-2022
SAMUEL A. SABET, Plaintiff, v. ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES; SCOTT MYERS, ESQ., Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
On January 31, 2008, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing any new actions in this District without first obtaining leave to file. See S.A. Godowner v. Footlocker, Inc., No. 07-CV-11042 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. 08-1068-cv (2d Cir. May 29, 2008). Plaintiff filed this new pro se action, seeks in forma pauperis status (IFP), and has not sought leave to file from the Court. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to comply with the January 31, 2008, judgment. All pending motions are terminated.
In S.A. Godowner, No. 07-CV-11042 (KMW), Plaintiff sued Footlocker, Inc., under the name “S.A. Godowner.” Plaintiff has previously sued Footlocker, Inc., under the names Sabet and Godowner. See Sabet v. Doe, Owner of Wordmark “Footlocker Inc., ” No. 07-CV-5882 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. June 21, 2007) (dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted); Godowner v. Footlocker, Inc., No. 08-CV-0338 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. Jan 15, 2008) (voluntarily withdrawn).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). 1
Plaintiff consents to electronic service. (ECF 3.)
SO ORDERED. 2