From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sabatino v. Davis

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02420-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02420-LTB-BNB.

February 23, 2010


ORDER


This matter arises on the petitioner's Motion to Depose Witness [Doc. #12, filed 12/21/2009] (the "Motion"). The Motion is DENIED.

The petitioner has filed an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. #3] (the "Application"). The petitioner seeks leave to depose Dr. Maria Patterson, Chief Psychologist at the United States Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois. The petitioner states that "Dr. Patterson's testimony is crucial to the court's understanding of how the petitioner's rights were violated." Motion, p. 2. The petitioner submits 12 questions for Dr. Patterson.

Habeas petitioners have no automatic right to discovery. Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899, 904 (1997). Rather, "[a] judge may, for good cause shown, authorize [a habeas petitioner] to conduct discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. . . ." Habeas Corpus, Rule 6(a) and Rule 1(b).

The Application raises the issue of whether the petitioner was denied due process during prison disciplinary proceedings. The discovery sought by the petitioner does not bear on that issue.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Sabatino v. Davis

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02420-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Sabatino v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SABATINO, Applicant, v. BLAKE DAVIS, Warden, USP Florence Max, ADX…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02420-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 23, 2010)