From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saavedra v. Mackey

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 8, 2021
2:21-cv-01587-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01587-KJM-JDP

12-08-2021

MARY JO SAAVEDRA, Plaintiff, v. RIDDELL MACKEY, JEFFERY DEGROOT, and EAN HOLDINGS LLC, an Oklahoma limited liability company, and DOES 1 TO 25, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO SERVE CANADIAN DEFENDANTS

Upon consideration of plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time to Serve Canadian Defendants, and finding that good cause exists to extend the 90-day time period to serve defendants pursuant to FRCP 4(m), and that plaintiff consents to the dismissal of the defendants DOES 1 to 25 pursuant to FRCP 4(m), plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time To Serve Canadian Defendants is granted. Plaintiff shall now have until March 2, 2022 to serve the Canadian defendants. Defendants DOES 1 to 25 are dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Saavedra v. Mackey

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 8, 2021
2:21-cv-01587-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Saavedra v. Mackey

Case Details

Full title:MARY JO SAAVEDRA, Plaintiff, v. RIDDELL MACKEY, JEFFERY DEGROOT, and EAN…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01587-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)