Opinion
2:23-CV-00592-KJN
08-09-2023
SABRI SAADOON, Plaintiff, v. ROHIT NEPAL, ET AL., Defendants.
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEIMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This case concerns the visa application of plaintiff's son, which was refused for administrative processing following a February 2022 consular interview. (See generally, ECF No. 1.) On August 7, 2023, defendants submitted a third stipulated request for extension of time in which to respond to the complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Per defendants' request, the consular official has not yet completed the adjudication of the visa application in this case; however, the parties anticipate that the adjudication will be completed shortly, which will render the lawsuit moot. (Id. at 1.)
The court finds defendants have shown good cause for the extension of time to respond to the complaint, and therefore GRANTS the request. Defendants shall file an answer or other dispositive pleading by September 8, 2023.