From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.A. v. Maiden

California Court of Appeals
Sep 11, 2014
229 Cal.App.4th 497 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. D064097.

09-11-2014

S.A., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JAN MAIDEN et al., Defendants and Respondents.


[Modification of opinion (229 Cal.App.4th 27, ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]

THE COURT. — THE OPINION FILED on August 21, 2014, is modified to add the following footnote at the end of the heading "FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND" [229 Cal.App.4th 32, advance report, end of the header, line 6], and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

"The facts set forth in this opinion are based on N.A.'s declaration in support of her anti-SLAPP motion to strike S.A.'s complaint against her."

The preexisting footnotes are renumbered accordingly.

There is no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

S.A. v. Maiden

California Court of Appeals
Sep 11, 2014
229 Cal.App.4th 497 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

S.A. v. Maiden

Case Details

Full title:S.A., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JAN MAIDEN et al., Defendants and…

Court:California Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 11, 2014

Citations

229 Cal.App.4th 497 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)