From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S. Towns Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Steinig

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Oct 5, 2018
165 A.D.3d 1630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

1040 CA 18–00334

10-05-2018

SOUTH TOWNS SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C., Daniel J. Patterson, D.O., F.A.C.O.S., and Kenneth H. Eckhert, III, M.D., F.A.C.S., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Jeffrey P. STEINIG, M.D., F.A.C.S., Defendant–Appellant.

LAW OFFICE OF RALPH C. LORIGO, WEST SENECA (FRANK J. JACOBSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (AMBER E. STORR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS.


LAW OFFICE OF RALPH C. LORIGO, WEST SENECA (FRANK J. JACOBSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (AMBER E. STORR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order that, inter alia, granted plaintiffs' motion for leave to reargue their opposition to defendant's motion for partial summary judgment and, upon reargument, denied defendant's motion in its entirety, we reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion for leave to reargue. The court properly granted leave to reargue on the ground that it misapprehended the facts and law in determining defendant's motion for partial summary judgment (see Smith v. City of Buffalo, 122 A.D.3d 1419, 1420, 997 N.Y.S.2d 563 [4th Dept. 2014] ; Luppino v. Mosey, 103 A.D.3d 1117, 1118, 958 N.Y.S.2d 823 [4th Dept. 2013] ; see generally CPLR 2221[d][2] ). With respect to the merits of defendant's motion, we affirm the order for reasons stated in the court's decision.


Summaries of

S. Towns Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Steinig

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Oct 5, 2018
165 A.D.3d 1630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

S. Towns Surgical Assocs., P.C. v. Steinig

Case Details

Full title:SOUTH TOWNS SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C., Daniel J. Patterson, D.O.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 5, 2018

Citations

165 A.D.3d 1630 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
83 N.Y.S.3d 926

Citing Cases

Nationstar Mortg. v. Goodman

With respect to that part of the motion seeking leave to renew, plaintiff submitted new facts—i.e., the…

Counsel Fin. Holdings v. Sullivan Law, L.L.C.

The only extrinsic evidence submitted by plaintiff in Sullivan I was a two-page line of credit statement,…