S. Samuels Co. v. Morgan Friedlander

1 Citing case

  1. Potomac Fire Ins. Co. v. Finck Cigar Co.

    48 S.W.2d 507 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932)

    The authorities seem to be uniform in holding that no bond is necessary to such appeal. It has been repeatedly so held by our Supreme Court (Houston T. C. Ry. Co. v. Red Cross Stock Farm, 91 Tex. 628, 45 S.W. 375; Yarbrough v. Collins, 91 Tex. 306, 42 S.W. 1052; Edwards v. Morton, 92 Tex. 153, 46 S.W. 792, 793), and by the several Courts of Civil Appeals (Missouri, K. T. R. Co. v. Milliron, 53 Tex. Civ. App. 325, 115 S.W. 655; Albritton v. First Nat. Bank, 85 S.W. 1008; Samuels Co. v. Morgan Friedlander, 207 S.W. 338; J. A. Kemp Grocer Co. v. Keith, 48 S.W. 743; Brown v. Dutton, 38 Tex. Civ. App. 294, 85 S.W. 454; Willett v. Herrin, 161 S.W. 26), including this court (Thomas v. Hogan, 57 S.W. 300; Clifford v. Kohr, 61 S.W. 424; Karnes County v. Ray, 57 S.W. 76, 77; Feagan v. BartonParker Mfg. Co., 42 Tex. Civ. App. 373, 93 S.W. 1076; Karnes County v. Nichols, 54 S.W. 656; Johnson County Sav. Bank v. Midkiff Caudle, 106 S.W. 1131). There seems to be no authority to the contrary.