Opinion
7:22-CV-00052 (WLS)
11-28-2023
ORDER
W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Before the Court is Plaintiff s Unopposed Motion to Restrict (Doc. 120). Therein, Plaintiff asks the Court to restrict Plaintiff s Reply brief (Doc. 119) and the three (3) attached Exhibits (Docs. 119-4; 119-5; and 119-6) to the Court and the case participants. Plaintiff explains that its Reply brief (Doc. 119) and its three exhibits contain documentation and information that have been designated as confidential by Defendants. Plaintiff further notes that it conferred with Defense Counsel regarding the instant Motion and that Defendants do not oppose it. (Doc. 120, at 1).
For good cause shown, Plaintiff s Unopposed Motion to Restrict (Doc. 120) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to restrict the access of Plaintiff s Reply brief (Doc. 119) and its three exhibits (Docs. 119-4; 119-5; and 119-6) only to the Court and the case participants.
SO ORDERED