From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S. N. Trading Corporation v. Amazon Bldg. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

July, 1932.


Order granting motion to punish for contempt reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without costs. The provision in the judgment sought to be enforced as for a contempt is enforcible by issuance of execution, despite the fact that the judgment refrains from providing that it might be so enforced. ( Marlee, Inc., v. Bittar, 257 N.Y. 240; Myers v. Becker, 95 id. 486; Harris v. Elliott, 163 id. 269.) Young, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., concurs in result; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to dismiss the appeal. [See post, p. —.]


Summaries of

S. N. Trading Corporation v. Amazon Bldg. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

S. N. Trading Corporation v. Amazon Bldg. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:S. N. TRADING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. AMAZON BUILDING CORPORATION and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Nelson v. Hirsch

Whether or not it is enforcible by execution against the person may not be determined on this record. ( S. …

Hennig v. Abrahams

We are of opinion that the judgment may be enforced by means of execution and that, therefore, contempt…