From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S. Hekemian Co. v. Rivara

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
122 N.J.L. 523 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued February 9, 1939 —

Decided April 21, 1939.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 121 N.J.L. 418.

For the appellant, Breslin Breslin.

For the respondents, Huckin Huckin.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

S. Hekemian Co. v. Rivara

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 21, 1939
122 N.J.L. 523 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

S. Hekemian Co. v. Rivara

Case Details

Full title:S. HEKEMIAN CO., APPELLANT, v. IDA RIVARA ET AL., EXECUTORS, RESPONDENTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 21, 1939

Citations

122 N.J.L. 523 (N.J. 1939)
6 A.2d 392

Citing Cases

Tulp v. Padula

The burden of proving that defendants employed him as their broker is upon plaintiff ( Naum v. Wiltsie, 271…

Schanerman v. Everett and Carbin, Inc.

Thus, there being no evidence sufficient to support an inference either that Everett bound defendant to pay…