Opinion
Case No. SACV13-193-JVS(RNBx)
09-03-2013
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF LAW, Plaintiff, v. ARCHIE "JOE" BIGGERS, et. al., Defendants.
STARR BABCOCK (63473) LAWRENCE C. YEE (84208) RACHEL S. GRUNBERG (197080) OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA JAMES M. WAGSTAFFE (95535) MICHAEL VON LOEWENFELDT (178665) KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP Attorneys for Defendants ARCHIE “JOE” BIGGERS ET AL.
STARR BABCOCK (63473)
LAWRENCE C. YEE (84208)
RACHEL S. GRUNBERG (197080)
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES M. WAGSTAFFE (95535)
MICHAEL VON LOEWENFELDT (178665)
KERR & WAGSTAFFE LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
ARCHIE "JOE" BIGGERS ET AL.
JUDGMENT
Honorable James V. Selna
WHEREAS the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint on June 12, 2013 with leave to amend Plaintiff's second cause of action only (Dkt. No. 24), denied Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction on June 14, 2013 (Dkt. No. 25), and granted Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on August 26, 2013 without leave to amend (Dkt. No. 39),
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Final judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Archie "Joe" Biggers, James A. Bolton, J. Scott Bovitz, David A. Carrillo, Lisa Cummins, Patrick R. Dixon, Cometria C. Cooper, Richard A. Frankel, K.V. Kumar, Sean M. McCoy, John P. McNicholas, Sandra Mendoza, Martha Pruden-Hamiter, Steven J. Renick, Sandra L. Salazar, Larry Sheingold, James Vaughn, Jeanne C. Vanderhoff, Lee H. Wallach, Patricia P. White, and Alan Yochelson (collectively "Defendants") and against Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law ("SCIL").
2. Plaintiff SCIL shall take nothing from Defendants in this matter.
3. Defendants are the prevailing parties in this matter and shall be entitled to recover their costs of suit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________
HON. JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE