From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rysdam v. Rysdam

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 15, 1938
84 P.2d 112 (Or. 1938)

Opinion

Argued at Pendleton November 2, 1938

Affirmed November 15, 1938

Appeal from Circuit Court, Union County, J.W. KNOWLES, Judge.

Suit by Mildred Rysdam against Albert Rysdam for a divorce. Decree for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

AFFIRMED.

R.J. Green, of La Grande (Green Hess, of La Grande, on the brief), for appellant.

S.H. Burleigh, of La Grande (Burleigh Burleigh, of La Grande, on the brief), for respondent.


In Banc.


This is a divorce proceeding wherein the defendant is charged with cruel and inhuman treatment. Defendant, after denying the allegations of cruelty, answered by way of a cross complaint, alleging that plaintiff was guilty of cruel and inhuman treatment towards him. The trial court rendered a decree of divorce in favor of plaintiff, awarding her custody of the three minor children and certain interests in the real property owned by defendant. From this decree, the defendant appeals.

There are no questions of law involved. The decision hinges solely upon questions of fact concerning which there is a direct conflict in the evidence. The able and experienced trial judge, who saw and heard the witnesses testify, is better able to determine the truth than we who are compelled to make deductions from the cold record. A consideration of the testimony, however, convinces us that the findings of the lower court are supported by the greater weight of the evidence.

It follows that the decree is affirmed.

ROSSMAN and KELLY, JJ., not sitting.


Summaries of

Rysdam v. Rysdam

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 15, 1938
84 P.2d 112 (Or. 1938)
Case details for

Rysdam v. Rysdam

Case Details

Full title:RYSDAM v. RYSDAM

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Nov 15, 1938

Citations

84 P.2d 112 (Or. 1938)
84 P.2d 112

Citing Cases

Hollingsworth v. Hollingsworth

While we believe that we have rightly determined the preponderance of the evidence, nevertheless we deem it…

Evans v. Evans

This court has repeatedly recognized as a guiding, though not controlling, rule that a decree of divorce in…