Rymer v. Smith

4 Citing cases

  1. Cross v. Stokes

    275 Ga. 872 (Ga. 2002)   Cited 10 times

    See alsoAnderson v. Anderson, 210 Ga. 464, 471 ( 80 S.E.2d 807) (1954); Matter of Estate of Roosa, 753 P.2d 1028 (Wyo. 1988) (the appointment of a guardian under the Uniform Veterans' Guardianship Act does not result in a presumption of insanity or lack of testamentary capacity). But see Rymer v. Smith, 38 Tenn. App. 414 ( 274 S.W.2d 643) (1954). OCGA § 29-6-11(c) states:

  2. U.S. v. Sanders

    314 F.3d 236 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 3 times
    Holding state law governed the effectiveness of a change of beneficiary by a guardian

    Like a conservator, a guardian of an incompetent veteran is empowered with the same duties as a guardian of a minor. Rymer v. Smith, 38 Tenn.App. 414, 274 S.W.2d 643, 648 (1954). The purpose of appointing a conservator is "to preserve the estate of an incompetent or disabled person.". . . [A] conservator "shall have the same duties and powers as a guardian of a minor, and all laws related to the guardianship of a minor shall be applicable to a conservator."

  3. In re Est. and Guardianship of Andrews

    2002 WY 17 (Wyo. 2002)   Cited 7 times

    How Andrews chooses to structure his last will and testament would then be decided, but his estate (including his home) would be available to provide care for Andrews during the remainder of his life. [¶ 44] Although the case is not directly in point with respect to the wording of the governing statutes, I find enough similarity in the case of Rymer v. Smith, 274 S.W.2d 643, 646-48 (Tenn.App. 1954), to accord it the status of persuasive precedent for the propositions set out above. In Rymer, the court held that establishment of a UVGA guardianship, in the manner provided for in the statute, was constructive notice to all, and financial transactions with a protected veteran were void.

  4. Home Town Finance Corporation v. Frank

    13 Utah 2 (Utah 1962)   Cited 4 times
    Referring to "guardian of his person" as one who "look after his personal affairs"

    See Title 75, Chapter 13, Guardianship, U.C.A. 1953. 173 A.L.R. Anno. Uniform Veterans' Guardianship Act 1077, IV, Sec. 12; Morse v. Caldwell, 55 Ga. App. 804, 191 S.E. 479; Rentz v. King, 66 Ga. App. 292, 17 S.E.2d 896; In re Vaell's Estate, 158 Cal.App.2d 204, 322 P.2d 579; but see Rymer v. Smith, 38 Tenn. App. 414, 274 S.W.2d 643 for other viewpoint. The federal regulation extant in 1957 when this appointment was made and in 1958 when the contracts here in question were agreed on, contains the following provision: