From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ryles v. T. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 20, 2008
No. CIV S-08-0074 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0074 LKK GGH P.

May 20, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file his amended complaint pursuant to the court's order of April 28, 2008. Also, plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's May 12, 2008 request for an extension of time (Docket #13) is granted;

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file his amended complaint; and

3. Plaintiff's May 12, 2008 request for the appointment of counsel (Docket #13) is denied.


Summaries of

Ryles v. T. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 20, 2008
No. CIV S-08-0074 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Ryles v. T. Felker

Case Details

Full title:AMOS RYLES, Plaintiff, v. T. FELKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 20, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-0074 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2008)