From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rykard v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Columbus Division
Jun 23, 2009
CASE NO. 4:08-CV-74(CDL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 23, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:08-CV-74(CDL).

June 23, 2009


ORDER


On May 14, 2009, Defendant Aaron Richardson filed an untimely Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Presently pending before the Court is Richardson's Motion to Open Default (Doc. 30). No entry of default has been made against Richardson. The Court construes Richardson's motion as a motion for extension of time to file an answer such that his previously filed untimely answer shall be permitted. Because no objections to such an extension have been filed and the Court otherwise finds that an extension should be permitted under the circumstances, the Court grants Richardson's motion and deems Richardson's previously filed answer to be timely filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rykard v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Columbus Division
Jun 23, 2009
CASE NO. 4:08-CV-74(CDL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Rykard v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BILLY B. RYKARD, Plaintiff, v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., d/b/a…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Columbus Division

Date published: Jun 23, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 4:08-CV-74(CDL) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 23, 2009)