From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ryan v. LCS, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 3, 1999
723 A.2d 975 (N.J. 1999)

Opinion

Argued February 17, 1999.

Decided March 3, 1999.

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 311 N.J. Super. 618, 710 A.2d 1050 (1998).

Kenneth L. Thomson, argued the cause for appellants ( Schottland, Manning, Rosen, Caliendo Munson, attorneys).

Jay Lavroff, argued the cause for respondent ( Lindabury, McCormick Estabrook, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kimmelman's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 311 N.J. Super. 618, 710 A.2d 1050 (1998). For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Ryan v. LCS, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 3, 1999
723 A.2d 975 (N.J. 1999)
Case details for

Ryan v. LCS, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARIE K. RYAN AND THOMAS R. RYAN, CO-ADMINISTRATORS AND ADMINISTRATORS AD…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 3, 1999

Citations

723 A.2d 975 (N.J. 1999)
723 A.2d 975

Citing Cases

Rutgers v. Collins

] We thus held in Ryan v. LCS, Inc. 311 N.J. Super. 618, 710 A.2d 1050 (App.Div. 1998), aff'd o.b. 157 N.J.…

Flomerfelt v. Cardiello

In similar circumstances, courts have not read a causal nexus into the otherwise plain terms. See, e.g.,…