From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ryan v. Lanuza

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 24, 1992
419 S.E.2d 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

A92A0858.

DECIDED APRIL 24, 1992. RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 12, 1992.

Action for damages. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Cochran, pro hac vice.

Jerry G. Ryan, Sr., pro se.

Cheryl Lanuza, pro se.


The Magistrate Court of Fulton County entered a judgment in this action for damages in favor of plaintiff Lanuza and against defendant Ryan. Defendant appealed to the State Court of Fulton County which, after hearing testimony and considering evidence, entered a judgment against him in the amount of $499 principal, plus costs and future interest. Defendant then filed this direct appeal. Held:

Because the judgment in this action for damages was for $10,000 or less and because the appeal to this Court is taken from the decision of a state court reviewing a decision of a magistrate court by de novo proceeding involving a subject matter not otherwise subject to a right of direct appeal, the discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-35 were required and this appeal must be dismissed. Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751 ( 406 S.E.2d 225); Batchelor v. ISFA Corp., 191 Ga. App. 238 ( 382 S.E.2d 434); Covrig v. Campbell, 187 Ga. App. 39 ( 369 S.E.2d 293); OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6, 11).

Appeal dismissed. Sognier, C. J., and Cooper, J., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 24, 1992 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 12, 1992 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Ryan v. Lanuza

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 24, 1992
419 S.E.2d 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Ryan v. Lanuza

Case Details

Full title:RYAN v. LANUZA

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

419 S.E.2d 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
419 S.E.2d 539