Opinion
4831, 101515/13.
10-31-2017
In re Anita RYAN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Raymond KELLY, etc., et al., Respondents–Respondents.
Ungaro & Cifuni, LLP, New York (Nicholas Cifuni of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Scott Shorr of counsel), for respondents.
Ungaro & Cifuni, LLP, New York (Nicholas Cifuni of counsel), for appellant.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Scott Shorr of counsel), for respondents.
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo S. Hagler, J.), entered January 6, 2016, denying the petition to annul a determination of respondent Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, Article II, dated August 17, 2013, which denied petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner failed to submit evidence showing that her disabling condition of systemic sclerosis, which is not recognized as a qualifying physical condition under the World Trade Center (WTC) law, was a "new onset disease" (see Retirement and Social Security Law § 2[36][c][v] ). Accordingly, petitioner has failed to show entitlement to the statutory presumption that her condition was caused by her exposure to toxins during her rescue and recovery work at the World Trade Center site (see Matter of Stavropoulos v. Bratton, 148 A.D.3d 449, 450–451, 454, 50 N.Y.S.3d 2 [1st Dept.2017] ).
Credible record evidence supported the Board of Trustees' determination, by a tied vote, that petitioner's condition was not caused by her work at the WTC site (see Matter of Meyer v. Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1–B Pension Fund, 90 N.Y.2d 139, 144–145, 659 N.Y.S.2d 215, 681 N.E.2d 382 [1997] ). Indeed, petitioner's physicians all acknowledged that, while a link to environmental risk factors such as silica dust is suspected, the etiology of her condition remains unknown.
RICHTER, J.P., WEBBER, KERN, MOULTON, JJ., concur.