From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RVC Associates v. Farkas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1999
261 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 3, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for entry of a judgment in the principal amount of $70,833.22 plus interest.

In support of its motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint ( see, CPLR 3213), the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by producing the promissory note executed by the parties and demonstrating that the defendants had defaulted in payment thereon ( see, Silber v. Muschel, 190 A.D.2d 727). In opposition to the summary judgment motion, the defendants failed to submit adequate proof of an evidentiary nature to substantiate their allegations that they were fraudulently induced into executing the promissory note ( see, Doby's Delicatessen v. Brunkard, 202 A.D.2d 626).

Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

RVC Associates v. Farkas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 1999
261 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

RVC Associates v. Farkas

Case Details

Full title:RVC ASSOCIATES, Appellant, v. SOL FARKAS et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 514

Citing Cases

Two Lincoln Advisory Services v. Shields

The Supreme Court properly awarded judgment to the plaintiff. The plaintiff established a prima facie case by…

KBL Deli, LLC v. Galasso

In the absence of proof substantiating the allegation of fraud the maker of a note is liable. RVC Associates…