Opinion
No. 69660
OPINION FILED: November 19, 1996
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE MARK D. SEIGEL.
Daniel P. Card, II Paule, Camazine Blumenthal, P.C., Clayton, for plaintiff-appellant.
Susan M. Hais, James P. Carmody, Clayton, for respondent-respondent.
Before Lawrence G. Crahan, P.J. and Stanley A. Grimm, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.
ORDER
Thomas R. Ruzicka (Father) appeals from a judgment and decree entered by the trial court in a paternity action. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).