From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruvoldt v. Tumulty

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 22, 1969
107 N.J. Super. 494 (App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

Argued October 20, 1969 —

Decided October 22, 1969.

Before Judges, GOLDMANN, LEWIS and MATTHEWS.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Law Division, Hudson County.

Reported at 107 N.J. Super. 545 ( Law Div. 1969).

Mr. Gregory J. Castano, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney pro se).

Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr. argued the cause for respondents ( Messrs. Ruvoldt Ruvoldt, attorneys pro se. Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, filed a statement in lieu of brief ( Mr. Kenneth M. Olex, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).


This matter has been heard on an accelerated basis at the request of the parties.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the oral opinion of Assignment Judge Artaserse. 107 N.J. Super. 545. Costs to plaintiffs.


Summaries of

Ruvoldt v. Tumulty

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 22, 1969
107 N.J. Super. 494 (App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Ruvoldt v. Tumulty

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, AND HAROLD J. RUVOLDT, JR., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 22, 1969

Citations

107 N.J. Super. 494 (App. Div. 1969)
259 A.2d 465

Citing Cases

In re Investigation Regarding Ringwood Fact Finding Committee Re Violation of N. J. S. A. 19:34-38.1

" Justice Wachenfeld found in Morss that the wiretapping investigation constituted no legislative impairment…

Cupano v. Gluck

The Legislature has given the power to investigate the civil consequences of such violations to two…