From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rutnam v. University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1575 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. CA 07-00051.

April 25, 2008.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Thomas J. Murphy, J.), entered December 13, 2006. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendants The Syracuse University, also known as Syracuse University, Syracuse University Health Services and Syracuse University Counseling Center for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint against them.

CARROLL CARROLL, LAWYERS, P.C., SYRACUSE (JOHN BENJAMIN CARROLL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BOND, SCHOENECK KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (THOMAS E. MYERS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Present: Smith, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Pine and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).


Summaries of

Rutnam v. University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1575 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Rutnam v. University

Case Details

Full title:ANITA RUTNAM, Appellant, v. THE SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, Also Known as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 25, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 1575 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3857
855 N.Y.S.2d 393