From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rutledge v. Cnty. of Lassen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
No. 2: 11-cv-1546 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2: 11-cv-1546 KJN P

09-06-2011

EUGENE DARREL RUTLEDGE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LASSEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On August 31, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this matter to the undersigned for the purpose of determining whether plaintiff's in forma pauperis status should continue for appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

The undersigned has determined that plaintiff's appeal is neither frivolous nor in bad faith.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Rutledge v. Cnty. of Lassen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 6, 2011
No. 2: 11-cv-1546 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Rutledge v. Cnty. of Lassen

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE DARREL RUTLEDGE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LASSEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

No. 2: 11-cv-1546 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2011)