From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rutledge v. City of Norfolk

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 23, 2009
358 F. App'x 409 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-1898.

Submitted: December 17, 2009.

Decided: December 23, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00129-MSD-JEB).

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Richard Fox, Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rutledge v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:09-cv-00129-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. filed July 30; entered July 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Rutledge v. City of Norfolk

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 23, 2009
358 F. App'x 409 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Rutledge v. City of Norfolk

Case Details

Full title:Merle T. RUTLEDGE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 23, 2009

Citations

358 F. App'x 409 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Rutledge v. City of Danville

See Dismissal Order, supra. Plaintiff appealed, and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the dismissal. See Rutledge…