From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rutherford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 27, 2016
192 So. 3d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 1D16–1188.

05-27-2016

Wilburn H. RUTHERFORD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Wilburn H. Rutherford, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Wilburn H. Rutherford, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief. Because the circuit court has recently issued an order striking four grounds raised in the motion with leave to amend, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus, but encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rutherford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 27, 2016
192 So. 3d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Rutherford v. State

Case Details

Full title:Wilburn H. RUTHERFORD, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: May 27, 2016

Citations

192 So. 3d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)