In Rutherford v. Schattman (119 N.Y. 604) it was stated that until a conspiracy was prima facie proved, the acts and declarations of an alleged conspirator were not admissible as against others, but were against himself.
Summary of this case from People v. ConnollyArgued December 5, 1889
Decided January 14, 1890
J.F. Parkhurst for plaintiff.
Randolph Sampter for defendants.
PECKHAM, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Rutherford v. Schattman (119 N.Y. 604) it was stated that until a conspiracy was prima facie proved, the acts and declarations of an alleged conspirator were not admissible as against others, but were against himself.
Summary of this case from People v. ConnollyFull title:THOMAS R. RUTHERFORD, as Assignee, etc., Appellant and Respondent, v …
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 14, 1890
But in that case it was stated that the admissions of the assignor were proof of his fraudulent intent as to…
Brokaw v. DuffyThat statement, whether right or wrong, was not a subject of exception any more than if it had been made by…