From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rutherford v. Ayers

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 1, 1979
254 S.E.2d 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

57058.

ARGUED JANUARY 15, 1979.

DECIDED MARCH 1, 1979.

Misrepresentation. Chattooga Superior Court. Before Judge Painter.

Duffey Sawhill, John E. Sawhill, III, for appellants.

William Ralph Hill, Jr., Robert Edward Surles, for appellees.


Appellants contend the trial court's grant of appellee's motion for summary judgment was erroneous because the evidence adduced below presented material issues of fact for submission to the jury. However, in his brief appellants' attorney does not cite any specific portion of the record in support of the claim of error, and, because of this failure to carry the appellate burden, we must affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 18 of Court of Appeals (Code Ann. § 24-3618); Rambo v. Fulton Financial Corp., 145 Ga. App. 791 ( 245 S.E.2d 12) (1978).

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 15, 1979 — DECIDED MARCH 1, 1979.


Summaries of

Rutherford v. Ayers

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 1, 1979
254 S.E.2d 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Rutherford v. Ayers

Case Details

Full title:RUTHERFORD et al. v. AYERS et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 1, 1979

Citations

254 S.E.2d 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
149 Ga. App. 190