From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruther v. Gash

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 2, 2017
No. 16-2068 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2017)

Opinion

No. 16-2068

02-02-2017

L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARRY GASH, Defendant - Appellee.

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN) Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

L. Ruther appeals the district court's order summarily dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Gash, No. 1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 19, 2016; entered Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Ruther v. Gash

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Feb 2, 2017
No. 16-2068 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Ruther v. Gash

Case Details

Full title:L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARRY GASH, Defendant - Appellee.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 2, 2017

Citations

No. 16-2068 (4th Cir. Feb. 2, 2017)

Citing Cases

Ruther v. United States

I recommend that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has a…