From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruther v. Contreras

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 7, 2010
396 F. App'x 977 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-1635.

Submitted: September 30, 2010.

Decided: October 7, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00495-RLW).

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


L. Ruther appeals the district court's order in his civil action denying his motion to recuse the district judge. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Contreras, No. 3:09-cv-00495-RLW (E.D.Va. Oct. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ruther v. Contreras

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 7, 2010
396 F. App'x 977 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Ruther v. Contreras

Case Details

Full title:L. RUTHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cecelia CONTRERAS; Mark Simmons…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

396 F. App'x 977 (4th Cir. 2010)