From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 30, 2015
623 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-1745

11-30-2015

MICHAEL RUTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF CREEDMOOR; ROBERT G. MORRIS, in his official and individual capacities; JOHN DOES 1-10, in their official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Michael Ruth, Appellant Pro Se. Dan M. Hartzog, Jr., CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00862-BR) Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Ruth, Appellant Pro Se. Dan M. Hartzog, Jr., CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Ruth appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ruth v. City of Creedmoor, No. 5:13-cv-00862-BR (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 30, 2015
623 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Ruth v. City of Creedmoor

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RUTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF CREEDMOOR; ROBERT G…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 30, 2015

Citations

623 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2015)