Opinion
Argued October 23 and 24, 1941 —
Decided January 9, 1942.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 127 N.J.L. 35, sub nom. Nicholas v. Martin.
For the appellants, R.E. A.D. Watson.
For the respondent, David T. Wilentz, Attorney-General, and William A. Moore, special counsel.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.