Opinion
January 8, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint (see, CPLR 1003) adding the appellant as a defendant in this action. At this juncture of the proceeding, we pass upon no other issue. Thompson, J.P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.