From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russo v. Star

United States District Court, N.D. California, at San Francsico
Feb 4, 2010
NO. CV09-5158, AT LAW AND IN AMIRALTY (N.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2010)

Opinion

NO. CV09-5158, AT LAW AND IN AMIRALTY.

February 4, 2010

ANTHONY M. URIE, PLLC., Attorney At Law, Smith River, CA, Shoreline, Washington, California State Bar No. 92363.

Marja Starzcewski, Pllc, Attorney At Law, WSBA#2611, Admitted Pro Hac Vice.

Harry B. Platis, Attorney At Law, WSBA#4509, Admitted Pro Hac Vice.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANTS


THIS MATTER having come before this Court upon motion of the plaintiffs for entry of an Order Granting an Extension of Time of an additional 120 days to serve defendants.

This court having considered the motion, declaration of Marja Starczewski, Esq. and the Memorandum of Points and Authorities.

WHEREFORE, no defendant parties having yet appeared or answered in this action, and good cause appearing to exist, it is

ORDERED that plaintiffs shall have an additional 120 days to serve defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Russo v. Star

United States District Court, N.D. California, at San Francsico
Feb 4, 2010
NO. CV09-5158, AT LAW AND IN AMIRALTY (N.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Russo v. Star

Case Details

Full title:MARK RUSSO, RUSSEL ROBINETTE, NEXT SEAFOOD COMPANY, INC. RON ALITOTI and…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, at San Francsico

Date published: Feb 4, 2010

Citations

NO. CV09-5158, AT LAW AND IN AMIRALTY (N.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2010)