From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russo v. Mock

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 25, 1998
721 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 1998)

Opinion

No. 91954.

November 25, 1998.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions, Fifth District — No. 97-2687 (Brevard County).

Blaise Trettis, Executive Assistant Public Defender, Melbourne, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.


We have for review Russo v. Mock, 701 So.2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (hereinafter Mock), wherein the district court cited for support Russo v. Akers, 701 So.2d 366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (hereinafter Akers), which was pending in this Court. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)( 3), Fla. Const.

We have since approved the district court decision in Akers. See Russo v. Akers, No. 91,943, ___ So.2d ___, 1998 WL 821778 (Fla. Nov. 25, 1998) (holding that a trial court can appoint a public defender to represent an indigent defendant in a noncapital proceeding under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850). Accordingly we approve the result in Mock.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, WELLS, ANSTEAD and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Russo v. Mock

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 25, 1998
721 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 1998)
Case details for

Russo v. Mock

Case Details

Full title:James RUSSO, etc., Petitioner, v. Gary Alan MOCK, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 25, 1998

Citations

721 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 1998)