Opinion
May 30, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the requested documents constituted attorney work product and therefore were not subject to discovery (see, CPLR 3101 [c]). Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.