From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russo v. Johnson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 10, 2023
1:23-cv-00639-JLT-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00639-JLT-BAM (PC)

08-10-2023

JUSTIN B. RUSSO, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

(DOC. 14)

Plaintiff Justin B. Russo is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On July 12, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge screened the first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff was directed to file objections within fourteen (14) days. (Id.) No objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has expired.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

1. The findings and recommendations issued on July 12, 2023, (Doc. 14), are ADOPTED IN FULL.
2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted.
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Russo v. Johnson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 10, 2023
1:23-cv-00639-JLT-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Russo v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN B. RUSSO, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 10, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00639-JLT-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2023)