From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russo v. Ambroselli

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-01825-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-01825-DAD P

07-16-2012

WAYNE RUBEN RUSSO, Petitioner, v. ROBERT AMBROSELLI, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. In his application, petitioner challenges a judgment of conviction entered against him by the Tuolumne County Superior Court. Tuolumne County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

2500 Tulare Street

Fresno, CA 93721

_________________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAD:mp
russ1825.109


Summaries of

Russo v. Ambroselli

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-01825-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Russo v. Ambroselli

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE RUBEN RUSSO, Petitioner, v. ROBERT AMBROSELLI, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 16, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-01825-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2012)