Opinion
Case No. 20-10221
01-11-2021
Staci Russell, Plaintiff, v. Three Pillars D/B/A Cornerstone Education Group, a Michigan non-profit corporation, Defendant.
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 22]
The Court reviewed Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 22]. The Court STRIKES that document for the following reason(s):
[×] Missing statement of concurrence. See Local Rule ("LR") 7.1(a).
[×] Missing required information (controlling or most appropriate authority and index of exhibits). See LR 7.1(d)(2).
[×] Does not contain a statement of material facts with numbered paragraphs or fails to respond to statement of material facts in motion. See Section 1(A) of Phase II Scheduling Order (Statement of Material Facts on Motion for Summary Judgment).
[ ] Wrong font size or improperly formatted (e.g., single-spaced, improper margins, missing page numbers, etc.). See LR 5.1(a)(2),(3).
[ ] Does not comply with Rule 18(b) of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures, regarding filing exhibits electronically. See LR 5.1.1(a).
[ ] Does not comply with Local Rule 5.3, regarding filing an item under seal in a civil case.
[ ] Over-length. See LR 7.1(d)(3).
[ ] Motion to dismiss/response to motion to dismiss relies primarily on summary judgment cases.
[ ] Does not comply with the Scheduling Order (or other Order or Notice) in this case for the following reasons: __________.
[ ] Other: __________.
The document is stricken and not part of the record. No motions are allowed to be filed until the Court holds a status conference.
IT IS ORDERED.
S/ Victoria A. Roberts
Victoria A. Roberts
United States District Judge Dated: 1/11/21