affirming Family Court's award of primary residential placement and stating that when the Family Court appropriately considers and weighs each of the best interest factors, the "law vests wide discretion in the trial court to determine where custody shall be placed"
Summary of this case from Murphy v. MurphyNo. 509, 2006.
November 1, 2007.
Appeal from the Family CA CN05-05447.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
affirming Family Court's award of primary residential placement and stating that when the Family Court appropriately considers and weighs each of the best interest factors, the "law vests wide discretion in the trial court to determine where custody shall be placed"
Summary of this case from Murphy v. Murphyaffirming Family Court's residential-placement determination and stating that when the Family Court appropriately considers and weighs each of the best-interest factors, the "law vests wide discretion in the trial court to determine where custody shall be placed"
Summary of this case from Price v. Brooksaffirming Family Court's determination of primary residential placement of child, and stating that when the Family Court appropriately considers and weighs each of the best interest factors, the "law vests wide discretion in the trial court to determine where custody shall be placed"
Summary of this case from Below v. Cowanaffirming Family Court's award of primary residential placement and stating that when the Family Court appropriately considers and weighs each of the best interest factors, the "law vests wide discretion in the trial court to determine where custody shall be placed"
Summary of this case from Lane v. Rileyaffirming Family Court's award of primary residential placement and stating that when the Family Court appropriately considers and weighs each of the best interest factors, the "law vests wide discretion in the trial court to determine where custody shall be placed"
Summary of this case from Richards v. Brownaffirming Family Court's award of primary residential placement and stating that when the Family Court appropriately considers and weighs each of the best interest factors, the "law vests wide discretion in the trial court to determine where custody shall be placed"
Summary of this case from Richards v. BrownFull title:Russell v. Stevens
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Nov 1, 2007
Further, the Family Court must consider "each of the eight `best interest' factors . . ., none of which is…
Richards v. BrownIn concluding that the child's primary residence should remain with the appellee, the Family Court acted…