From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 31, 2012
357 S.W.3d 316 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. WD 73179.

2012-01-31

Kimoni L. RUSSELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Nodaway County, Roger Martin Prokes, Judge.Darren E. Fulcher, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Nodaway County, Roger Martin Prokes, Judge.Darren E. Fulcher, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Division Three: KAREN KING MITCHELL, P.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and GARY D. WITT, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kimoni Russell appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing. He raises a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Russell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 31, 2012
357 S.W.3d 316 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Russell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kimoni L. RUSSELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

357 S.W.3d 316 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)