From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 12, 1997
693 So. 2d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 95-02171

Opinion filed March 12, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Claudia R. Isom, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Jennifer Y. Fogle, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


We affirm Clarence Russell's judgments and sentences. We remand this case to the circuit court to amend the written judgment to reflect that the conviction for count one was for a second-degree misdemeanor in violation of section 784.011, Florida Statutes (1993). Additionally, in order to conform to its oral pronouncement, we direct the court to amend the sentencing and probation documents to reflect that the $250 court costs were imposed in the form of a lien. Russell's presence is not required for these clerical corrections.

Judgments and sentences affirmed; remanded for clerical corrections.

THREADGILL, C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 12, 1997
693 So. 2d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Russell v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE RUSSELL, APPELLANT v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 12, 1997

Citations

693 So. 2d 599 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)