From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 17, 1999
725 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-2515

Opinion filed February 17, 1999. JANUARY TERM, 1999

An Appeal under Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ronald C. Dresnick, Judge; L.T. No. 95-35656.

Mark Russell, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lara J. Edelstein, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ.


We affirm the defendant's sentences as a violent career criminal, Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), and again certify conflict with the Second District's opinion in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted,717 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1998).

Affirmed; conflict certified.


Summaries of

Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 17, 1999
725 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Russell v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK RUSSELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 17, 1999

Citations

725 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Venero v. State

Therefore, I believe that this court should recede from its opinion inHiggs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d…

Scruggs v. State

Therefore, I believe that this court should recede from its opinion in Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872 (Fla. 3d…