From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Car Spa

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 14, 2019
Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-521 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-521

03-14-2019

SCHUYLER L. RUSSELL v. CAR SPA D/B/A CAR SPA PLANO


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 6, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #35) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Schuyler L. Russell's case be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff Schuyler L. Russell's case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

All relief not previously granted is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this the 14th day of March, 2019.

/s/_________

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Russell v. Car Spa

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Mar 14, 2019
Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-521 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2019)
Case details for

Russell v. Car Spa

Case Details

Full title:SCHUYLER L. RUSSELL v. CAR SPA D/B/A CAR SPA PLANO

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-521 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2019)

Citing Cases

Doll v. Pizer

The recitals in those deeds and releases are some evidence that the whole estate was disposed of by the…