From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RUSSELL v. RAO

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Aug 12, 2010
09-CV-6641L (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2010)

Opinion

09-CV-6641L.

August 12, 2010


DECISION AND ORDER


On or about June 24, 2010, the Clerk of Court noted an entry of default (Dkt. #7) because the defendants had failed to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Four days later, the defendants appeared by counsel and filed their answer (Dkt. #9) that same day.

Thereafter, defendants moved to vacate the entry of default (Dkt. #13). Plaintiff has filed a motion (Dkt. #12) for what he describes as a "default hearing."

Defendants obviously did not intend to default here and such was cured within a matter of days. Based on the declaration (Dkt. #16) submitted in support of defendants' motion to vacate entry of default, it is clear that defendants believe they have a meritorious defense.

CONCLUSION

Defendants' motion (Dkt. #13) to set aside entry of default is granted and such entry is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

RUSSELL v. RAO

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Aug 12, 2010
09-CV-6641L (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2010)
Case details for

RUSSELL v. RAO

Case Details

Full title:DAVID RUSSELL, Plaintiff, v. JADA RAO, MD, ABBASEY, MD, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Aug 12, 2010

Citations

09-CV-6641L (W.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2010)