Russell v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

1 Citing case

  1. Claypole v. Geico Cas. Co.

    Case No. CIV-17-1144-R (W.D. Okla. Mar. 6, 2018)

    Id. (footnotes omitted). See also Russell v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company, 866 P.2d 456 (Okla. Civ. App. 1993)("Nothing in [ยง 3622(A)] precludes an insurer from making a binder subject to a condition subsequent such as a requirement to complete an application and pay a premium. In fact, such a requirement is both prudent and reasonable.").