From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. OneWest Bank FSB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 9, 2012
No. CV 11-01463-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Mar. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 11-01463-PHX-FJM

03-09-2012

Thomas E. Russell, Plaintiff, v. OneWest Bank FSB, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Clerk entered default against defendant Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation ("Fairway") on October 17, 2011 (doc. 27). Plaintiff failed to file a motion for default judgment. On January 11, 2012, Fairway filed a motion to set aside entry of default (doc. 45), which plaintiff does not oppose (doc. 50). Fairway also filed a motion to dismiss (doc. 47), to which plaintiff responded (doc. 50) and Fairway replied (doc. 51).

Fairway seeks dismissal based on plaintiff's failure to comply with our order of January 6, 2011, ordering plaintiff to show good cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Doc. 44). But Fairway's motion to set aside entry of default makes our January 6 order moot.

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Fairway's unopposed motion to set aside entry of default (doc. 45).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DENYING Fairway's motion to dismiss (doc. 47) as premature, without prejudice to filing a new motion to dismiss on the merits.

____________

Frederick J. Martone

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Russell v. OneWest Bank FSB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 9, 2012
No. CV 11-01463-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Mar. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Russell v. OneWest Bank FSB

Case Details

Full title:Thomas E. Russell, Plaintiff, v. OneWest Bank FSB, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Mar 9, 2012

Citations

No. CV 11-01463-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Mar. 9, 2012)