From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Lattimore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-1538 WBS JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-1538 WBS JFM (HC)

09-08-2011

TITENESHA RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. MARY LATTIMORE, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file and serve objections to the findings and recommendations filed in this action on August 3, 2011. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Petitioner has also filed a document in which she states that the August 3, 2011 findings and recommendations do not address "two new grounds" she is raising, and that she does not believe she has reached the federal level of review. See Docket No. 19. This action was commenced on July 3, 2008 with the filing of a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition is dated June 30, 2008 and appears to have been signed by petitioner. On August 1, 2008, that petition was dismissed with leave to amend, and this action is proceeding on an amended petition, dated August 12, 2008 and file stamped August 18, 2008, also apparently signed by petitioner, that raises the claims addressed in the August 3, 2011 findings and recommendations.

1. Petitioner's August 15, 2011 motion for extension of time is granted; and

2. Petitioner shall file and serve objections to the findings and recommendations on or before September 15, 2011.

____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Russell v. Lattimore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-1538 WBS JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Russell v. Lattimore

Case Details

Full title:TITENESHA RUSSELL, Petitioner, v. MARY LATTIMORE, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 8, 2011

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-1538 WBS JFM (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)