From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 29, 1998
247 Conn. 916 (Conn. 1998)

Opinion

James B. Streeto, special public defender, in support of the petition. Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Decided September 29, 1998


The petitioner Eugene Russell's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 52 (AC 16711), is denied.


I would grant the petitioner's petition for certification to appeal on the following issues:

"1. Did the habeas court abuse its discretion in denying the petitioner certification to appeal on the grounds of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as a result of a conflict of interest based upon a violation of the trial attorney's duty of loyalty?

"2. If so, is the petitioner required to prove the second prong of Strickland — that is, as a result of the conflict of interest his defense was prejudiced — in order to be granted a new trial?"

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Phillips v. Warden, 220 Conn. 112, 132-33, 595 A.2d 1356 (1991) ("[w]here . . . the defendant claims that his counsel was `burdened by an actual conflict of interest' . . . the defendant need not establish actual prejudice" [citation omitted]).


Summaries of

Russell v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 29, 1998
247 Conn. 916 (Conn. 1998)
Case details for

Russell v. Commissioner of Correction

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE RUSSELL v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 29, 1998

Citations

247 Conn. 916 (Conn. 1998)
722 A.2d 807

Citing Cases

Russell v. Armstrong

Russell appealed the decision of the state habeas court to the Connecticut Appellate Court. That appeal was…

Russell v. Armstrong

There was no further evidence regarding the effect of the statements on Russell, on Sadick's representation…